CRMsoc ongoing

CRMsoc ongoing

Description:

What is CRMsoc

 

CRMsoc is an extension to the CIDOC CRM aimed at expanding the expressivity of the standard relative to the representation of conventionally grounded, socially constructed facts and their foundation in intentionality. In historical and social sciences, and increasingly in cultural heritage studies as they encounter the challenges of the decolonialist turn, it is typical to record and analyze the context which grounds and supports the commitment to socially constituted facts (names, memberships, ownership, rights, classifications, etc.). For facts which are established by convention as opposed to pure spatio-temporal facts, it is typically important for historical research to record the constituent actors, events, social conventions and the temporal boundaries which ground and characterize their original constitution and which support their continued existence. The purpose of this extension is thus to enable the representation and exchange of information regarding the social context and identity of conventional facts and the intentionality of actors for the exchange of said information in an objective and uniform manner.

 

CRMsoc provides an extension and overlay of CRMbase that delivers an intention-centric extension of temporal classes for the representation of the commitment of individuals and social groups to conventional facts as well as enabling the modelling of the conventional actions which establish or de-establish such facts.

 

What is the idea?

 

Historians, social scientists and cultural heritage specialists record and are concerned to understand, track and explain the evolution of socially constituted facts and other intentional phenomena like reading, discussing or voting. Conventionally attributed facts have a different ontological nature to physically established facts, being grounded in the communal epistemic commitment of a group to ‘something being the case’ called ‘social or collective representations’ in contemporary social sciences. The notion of intentionality, of taking something to be the case in the context of specific social representations, is called upon to allow the modelling of a rich set of relations required by researchers to understand when a fact or intentional phenomenon was the case, for whom and under what conditions. This extension thus allows the argumentation over empirically retrievable facts regarding the conventional agreement of groups about characteristics of entities over time and how these facts were established, maintained or de-established. 

 

This extension thus enriches the overall expressivity of CIDOC CRM for researchers and professionals for whom the parameters of the establishment of social fact are an object of direct study or have direct impact on their understanding of wider networks of knowledge. It is based on standard concepts in social philosophy and social psychology, notably the notions of intentionality and social representations, in order to propose a comprehensive perspective and without adopting the viewpoint of a specific author or school of thought.



Reference literature (selection):

 

Gallotti Mattia and Michael John (éds.), Perspectives on Social Ontology and Social Cognition, Dordrecht, Springer Netherlands, 2014.

Sammut Gordon et al. (éds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Social Representations, Cambridge, University Press, 2015.

Searle John, Making the Social World: The Structure of Human Civilization, Oxford University Press, 2010.

The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2021 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.) (online) (especially entries: Collective Intentionality, Mental Representation, Consciousness and Intentionality, Social Norms, etc.)

Thomas T. (ed.), Encyclopedia of critical psychology (New York: Springer Reference, 2014) (especially entries: Interobjectivity; Social Constructionism; Social Representations; Socialisation).

Status:

Ongoing

Contributors:

No contributors yet.

Description

Show Description Language Namespace
What is CRMsoc   CRMsoc is an extension to the CIDOC CRM aimed at expanding the expressivity of the standard relative to the representation of conventionally grounded, socially constructed facts and their foundation in intentionality. In historical and social sciences, and increasingly in cultural heritage studies as they encounter the challenges of the decolonialist turn, it is typical to record and analyze the context which grounds and supports the commitment to socially constituted facts (names, memberships, ownership, rights, classifications, etc.). For facts which are established by convention as opposed to pure spatio-temporal facts, it is typically important for historical research to record the constituent actors, events, social conventions and the temporal boundaries which ground and characterize their original constitution and which support their continued existence. The purpose of this extension is thus to enable the representation and exchange of information regarding the social context and identity of conventional facts and the intentionality of actors for the exchange of said information in an objective and uniform manner.   CRMsoc provides an extension and overlay of CRMbase that delivers an intention-centric extension of temporal classes for the representation of the commitment of individuals and social groups to conventional facts as well as enabling the modelling of the conventional actions which establish or de-establish such facts.   What is the idea?   Historians, social scientists and cultural heritage specialists record and are concerned to understand, track and explain the evolution of socially constituted facts and other intentional phenomena like reading, discussing or voting. Conventionally attributed facts have a different ontological nature to physically established facts, being grounded in the communal epistemic commitment of a group to ‘something being the case’ called ‘social or collective representations’ in contemporary social sciences. The notion of intentionality, of taking something to be the case in the context of specific social representations, is called upon to allow the modelling of a rich set of relations required by researchers to understand when a fact or intentional phenomenon was the case, for whom and under what conditions. This extension thus allows the argumentation over empirically retrievable facts regarding the conventional agreement of groups about characteristics of entities over time and how these facts were established, maintained or de-established.    This extension thus enriches the overall expressivity of CIDOC CRM for researchers and professionals for whom the parameters of the establishment of social fact are an object of direct study or have direct impact on their understanding of wider networks of knowledge. It is based on standard concepts in social philosophy and social psychology, notably the notions of intentionality and social representations, in order to propose a comprehensive perspective and without adopting the viewpoint of a specific author or school of thought. Reference literature (selection):   Gallotti Mattia and Michael John (éds.), Perspectives on Social Ontology and Social Cognition, Dordrecht, Springer Netherlands, 2014. Sammut Gordon et al. (éds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Social Representations, Cambridge, University Press, 2015. Searle John, Making the Social World: The Structure of Human Civilization, Oxford University Press, 2010. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2021 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.) (online) (especially entries: Collective Intentionality, Mental Representation, Consciousness and Intentionality, Social Norms, etc.) Thomas T. (ed.), Encyclopedia of critical psychology (New York: Springer Reference, 2014) (especially entries: Interobjectivity; Social Constructionism; Social Representations; Socialisation). en WIP

Contributors

No contributors yet.

Versions

CRMsoc ongoing is an ongoing namespace.

Root namespace: CRMsoc

Published versions

Namespace Publication date

Classes

Identifier Class Last updated Validation status
C8 Intentional Event 2022-02-09 Candidate
C7 Intentional Mode 2022-02-09 Candidate
C6 State of Mind 2022-02-09 Candidate
C5 Speech act 2022-02-09 Candidate
C4 Institutional Fact 2021-06-21 Candidate
C3 Intentional Entity 2022-02-09 Candidate
C2 Intention 2022-02-08 Candidate
C1 Representations 2022-02-09 Candidate

Properties

Domain Domain namespace Identifier Property Range Range namespace Last updated Validation status
Intention – C2 CRMsoc ongoing (1,n) P1 has content (is content of) (1,1) Propositional Object – E89 CIDOC CRM version 6.2 2022-08-13 Candidate
Speech act – C5 CRMsoc ongoing (0,n) P13 invoked (was invoked by) (0,n) Dissolution – E68 CIDOC CRM version 6.2 2022-02-09 Candidate
Speech act – C5 CRMsoc ongoing (0,n) P12 performed (was performed by) (0,n) Representations – C1 CRMsoc ongoing 2022-02-09 Candidate
Intentional Event – C8 CRMsoc ongoing (0,n) P9 has setting (is setting of) (1,n) Event – E5 CIDOC CRM version 6.2 2022-02-09 Candidate
Intention – C2 CRMsoc ongoing (0,n) P11 is about (is concerned by) (0,1) CRM Entity – E1 CIDOC CRM version 6.2 2022-02-09 Candidate
State of Mind – C6 CRMsoc ongoing (0,n) P10 has intentional mode (is intentional mode of) (0,1) Intentional Mode – C7 CRMsoc ongoing 2022-02-09 Candidate
Speech act – C5 CRMsoc ongoing (0,n) P8 terminates (is terminated by) (0,n) Institutional Fact – C4 CRMsoc ongoing 2021-06-23 Candidate
Speech act – C5 CRMsoc ongoing (1,n) P7 initiated (was initiated by) (0,n) Institutional Fact – C4 CRMsoc ongoing 2021-06-23 Candidate
Institutional Fact – C4 CRMsoc ongoing P6 has intentional target (is intentional target of) Dissolution – E68 CIDOC CRM version 6.2 2021-06-23 Candidate
Institutional Fact – C4 CRMsoc ongoing (0,n) P5 ascribes intentional relation (is intentional relation ascribed by) (0,1) Type – E55 CIDOC CRM version 6.2 2021-06-23 Candidate
Institutional Fact – C4 CRMsoc ongoing (0,n) P4 has intentional subject (is intentional subject of) (1,1) CRM Entity – E1 CIDOC CRM version 6.2 2021-06-23 Candidate
Institutional Fact – C4 CRMsoc ongoing (0,n) P3 holds for (is held by) (1,n) Intentional Entity – C3 CRMsoc ongoing 2021-06-23 Candidate
Intention – C2 CRMsoc ongoing (1,n) P2 is intention of (has intention) (1,1) Intentional Entity – C3 CRMsoc ongoing 2022-02-09 Candidate

Relations

Filter by

Source Source namespace Relation Target Target namespace Last updated Type
Representations – C1 CRMsoc ongoing rdfs:subClassOf Propositional Object – E89 CIDOC CRM version 6.2 2021-06-19 ClassesRelation-HierarchyAssociation
Intentional Entity – C3 CRMsoc ongoing rdfs:subClassOf Persistent Item – E77 CIDOC CRM version 6.2 2021-06-21 ClassesRelation-HierarchyAssociation
Institutional Fact – C4 CRMsoc ongoing rdfs:subClassOf State of Mind – C6 CRMsoc ongoing 2022-02-09 ClassesRelation-HierarchyAssociation
Actor – E39 CIDOC CRM version 6.2 rdfs:subClassOf Intentional Entity – C3 CRMsoc ongoing 2022-02-09 ClassesRelation-HierarchyAssociation
Speech act – C5 CRMsoc ongoing rdfs:subClassOf Intentional Event – C8 CRMsoc ongoing 2022-02-09 ClassesRelation-HierarchyAssociation
Intention – C2 CRMsoc ongoing rdfs:subClassOf Temporal Entity – E2 CIDOC CRM version 6.2 2022-02-08 ClassesRelation-HierarchyAssociation
State of Mind – C6 CRMsoc ongoing rdfs:subClassOf Intention – C2 CRMsoc ongoing 2022-02-09 ClassesRelation-HierarchyAssociation
Intentional Mode – C7 CRMsoc ongoing rdfs:subClassOf Type – E55 CIDOC CRM version 6.2 2022-02-09 ClassesRelation-HierarchyAssociation
Intentional Event – C8 CRMsoc ongoing rdfs:subClassOf Intention – C2 CRMsoc ongoing 2022-02-09 ClassesRelation-HierarchyAssociation

Notes

Show Note Type Language Entity

Comments

List of mismatches with reference namespaces

Entities listed here are not correctly associated with your reference namespaces. They are displayed in red in your ongoing namespace. They may not be available in the version of the selected space. Or you may not have selected any version of a reference namespace.
Please make the necessary corrections before proceeding.

Type of relation Entity Namespace Error type